Not as feature rich, quite buggy, inherently more private but also less usable.
The above compounds when trying to get the non-techies to use it, because sometimes it doesn’t just work
Not as feature rich, quite buggy, inherently more private but also less usable.
The above compounds when trying to get the non-techies to use it, because sometimes it doesn’t just work
I agree with the sentiment, but the action doesn’t do anything to address the immediate issue


Voyager dev


It serves the same function , but comparing the two is kind of apples to oranges at this point


Yeah. Entra is basically the cloud version of Active Directory, it lets you use SAML to build single sign on systems that use your Microsoft account as the identity provider


Yeah office isn’t the what orgs care about losing with this change. Business premium was the lowest cost license option available to non-profits that allowed access to identity management using entra.
I’d still recommend a good trim just cause that shit looks gross (imo)


Because it costs money to educate the doctors, then they want money.


Local hosting


Not that are as effective as a 12 gauge, no.

See, I just don’t think what you’ve deduced the argument to was what was actually said.

I mean the basic argument, that trans identifying peoples are in their own distinct categories outside of the typical gender binary, actually has some interesting meat to it.
Trans men and women do have different experiences from their cisgender counterparts, different medical needs, different journeys. None of which I am experienced enough in the subject to speak to.
Kinda loses me on their “I don’t use the word cis” part though

That’s actually not nearly as extreme as I was expecting


Yeah, a 2nd AP wired into the first router would eliminate any performance hit of having the router do both. Hard to say what the impact would be without testing though.


Hi, network engineer with a specialization in mikrotik, you’re on the right track.
You would configure the router to use one radio as your WAN connection, then NAT your internal connection using a masquerade rule. Pretty simple setup.
Some notable drawbacks for this dependent on model is that you will lose wireless speed as you will be using your wireless for upstream and downstream devices. This can be solved by using an AP on a different channel.
Note that mikrotik gives you a lot of ways to cut off your hands, so use safe mode for everything.
The specific topology you’re wanting to set up is something they teach you on day one at any mikrotik certification course.


You make up like 60% of the posts to this community lately, maybe it’s time to just block .ml for your well being


checks notes
Not sure I didn’t write anything down I was just doodling


That only works as long as other country view the USD as a viable reserve currency


Yeah they do an interesting about face on racism as long as it’s against white people
Idk right to repair matches the cultural zeitgeist in Texas, in my experience. This doesn’t surprise me.