• kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nobody’s “associating” anything. Nobody who’s calling someone retarded has any thoughts in their head about people with the mental disorder. If you called them a downie, then you would probably have a point; as it’s specifically worded to relate to downs syndrome.

        But “retard” has come to be an amplification of the word “idiot”. It’s like the words big, bigger, biggest.

        It’s the “biggest” of “idiot”.

        So if I’m gonna call someone an idiot, my levels of idiot are: Idiot, Dumb-ass, and Retard. I’m just calling them the word that corresponds to being a gargantuan idiot. You can’t use “gargantuan” because they don’t even know what the words mean; so you use retard.

        • AJ1@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          hey I have a question: how does everyone feel about “fucktard”? is that acceptable? it’s not a direct insult to persons with developmental disabilities, but it does have a fairly specific connotation that could be useful in certain situations, plus it throws out an F-bomb to emphasize your anger.

          but if that’s too offensive for some folks I guess I can just keep using “fuckmouth”, if that’s easier on the ears.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            but if that’s too offensive for some folks I guess I can just keep using “fuckmouth”, if that’s easier on the ears.

            fuck mouth might be too insensitive for those of us who have or don’t have sex, so basically all of humanity actually.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            “Retarded” isn’t a medical definition under IDC-11, so they aren’t retarded, as the medical definitions have changed.

            Also Retarded has another standard definition – Being held back or stunted of which applies here.

              • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                They stopped using that word because it wasn’t descriptive. The same reason they stopped diagnosing women as “hysterical”. That’s the cool thing about the sciences; they evolve and change over time to be more descriptive, not less.

                And now, we use the word hysterical to describe certain things…kinda cool how that works, right? When I call something hysterical (extremely funny) - people don’t get offended and say I’m using a slur.

                Or when someone is losing their shit, you say they’re acting hysterical. It’s become a descriptor.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        if someone is stupid, and making objectively stupid decisions, it would be fair to call them “developmentally challenged” especially if that person is donald trump, and the stupid decision is tariffs.

        Would it also be fair to call him a retard? Yes.

        should you? Probably not, would it be justified, yes.

        It’s only really fucked up if you’re using it belittle and demean someone, though there are also situations where this is deserved. Morals and ethics aren’t really a solid ground to stand on, more so a floating mass of garbage in the ocean, that just sort of, showed up one day.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            yeah, probably shouldn’t doesn’t mean you can’t though.

            Just because you probably shouldn’t yell at people, or swear at them, doesn’t mean you can’t or won’t.

            Not everything in this world is a binary, sometimes it’s situationally appropriate, sometimes it’s not, sometimes it’s in between.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                i don’t even necessarily disagree with that argument. I just don’t think it’s really all that relevant. I’m not even sure most people would disagree with it.

                Obviously you should be nice to people, you probably shouldn’t be an asshole, and you should help them as much as possible, but like, how many of us actually do that?

                It’s sort of like telling someone who smokes, that it’s bad for them, they know, you don’t need to remind them.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe try to come up with a more creative way to insult people than by using a slur?

      This is the same logic behind saying the f-slur is okay if you’re not using it to describe gay people, you’re just using it to insult a straight person… by comparing them to gay people. See the problem?