Ordinary fucking people man, I hate em.

Whore-du-veray

Even the cheapest Prosciutto is light-years ahead of whatever the fuck that Lunchables meat is made out of.

Bat-mite

Bat-mite

So what is the “right” way to use them?

So long as they are helping the “downtrodden”* it’s ok to see the numbers differently?

I have studied statistics. In my studies I learned that numbers do not lie, people lie. And, as was stated before, people can manipulate numbers to match their narrative.

I’ve seen studies published as “fact” just because the author manipulated the numbers to match their findings.

This is what we should base our outlook on?

*in this instance, “downtrodden” refers to the person or group deemed savable by those who are looking to be a savior.

So…statistics are only valid when they promote your ideals?

Or is it that, in your mind, the stats that don’t run parallel with your ideals have obviously been misinterpreted or fudged?

Just trying to figure out your stance on statistical data.

Quoting crime statistics based on gender:

Quoting crime statistics based on race:

Funny, I was just thinking the same thing about Hogg. I guess there are more commonalities than differences.

Hogg or Jones?

No matter, you’ve shown your true colors.

This kind of “anti-promotion” worked out great for Rings of Power, Cinderella, The Acolyte…

Cancelation of Last of Us after S3 imminent.

Exception: Fight Club as he only serves as a punching bag for Ed Norton.

Did a double feature of Honey Boy and Peanut Butter Falcon.

I thought both were quite good!

😂 poor little guy. What would you even do without DoorDash?!

There’s no way you could hack it, so there’s absolutely no way many, (MANY) other people could!

ADHD sufferer here.

A lot of these commenters seem to be using their ADHD as a crutch. Most people in my sphere are late because arriving late gets them the attention they crave.

Sorry, but having ADHD is NOT a good excuse when it comes to being somewhere on time.

Gaben during the interview:!

He would have voted. He would have written in “The reanimated head of Theodore Roosevelt”.

The Constitution is NOT ambiguous!..except 1A…and 2A…and 25A…you know what? It’s NOT ambiguous on things that I disagree with!!

Thief 2 would be awesome!!

Or she moves to a house that was built on top of a fault line: Quaking Bad