CorrectAlias

Yeah. Usually videos like this also make no mention of security implications and how to best secure your setup. It’s part of why shodan has so many vulnerable, public facing endpoints owned by individuals.

But the Americans sent to fight an illegal war were fine?

I would love to leave tech. Desperately. But I feel that I have no other real skills, and I have a mortgage that I need to pay and a house to maintain. I do have savings, but it would probably only last a year at best.

I would love to do something outdoors. Like, maybe for WA state’s park services. But I’ve heard that’s super competitive and next to impossible to get into without first volunteering for years.

Don’t remind me…

I do like that Kagi has a fediverse search option.

Agreed. I don’t see LLM services making an actual ROI any time soon unless something drastic changes.

The primary financial issue with LLMs taking people’s jobs is in the cost of operation, mainly for the LLM companies. They still have not made an ROI, not even close, and that’s with massive government contracts. I personally think that there’s one of three possibilities here. Most of the LLM companies could go under (but they may be “too big to fail” at this point), the LLM companies could start to charge far too much for the quality of the outputs causing some companies to back out, or the LLM companies will, by some miracle, get a ROI through a more efficient model.

The models are enshittified at the start, since they’re basically just hallucinating with guardrails. There’s not any way to make them truly deterministic. Even the “agents” that run through multiple iterations of code to find the “best” solution are lacking. This is because they cannot “think” logically.

My personal opinion, though, is that they’re simply using it as an excuse to fire workers and pump up company stock value. I don’t believe they actually think that LLMs can fully replace devs and engineers. So yes, while LLMs are taking jobs right now, it’s not because they’re good enough at what they do or anything like that. It’s just greed.

Despite signing it, Newsom issued a statement urging the legislature to amend the law before its effective date, citing concerns from streaming services and game developers about “complexities such as multi-user accounts shared by a family member and user profiles utilized across multiple devices.”

Then why the fuck did you sign it if it wasn’t ready and needed amendments? Is this what you’re going to do as president too?

Rhetorical, of course. Note how he doesn’t say he disagrees with the bill, just that it needed to consider family devices.

If this is who wins the primary, we are done. We’re basically already done, for sure, but him winning the primary would be the final nail in the coffin.

You lost me at “CEO says”

How am I trolling by asking for legitimate evidence to cover your claims?

He certainly has an influence - he’s still the chairman of the board. He gets to decide who gets fired and when. In some ways, he found a way to have more influence, while being less hands-on.

So list a single peer reviewed study that shows a deep learning model with free agency (like a human)? I’m not asking for all of them.

I don’t understand why you can’t give me the name or the title of the research?

I know what it means already. And don’t worry, I’m not taking your word for it. Nor am I going to listen to NDT’s podcast or trust his guests.

Deep learning is not the same as what you described. I know what they are, but they are not “with agency” in any normal sense. Can you give me an exact example of one of these research models “with agency” and not just an entire Wikipedia page?

Especially because an LLM was used

Where?

Can confirm, have enhanced WA license and it can get me over land borders without a passport. However, I also have a passport on top of it.

That’s called “source available”. FUTO basically did the same thing with their stuff after the community rightfully got angry over their use of “open source” in their docs.

Does that exist though?