• 1 Post
  • 220 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • Emasculated goes a bit far but I kinda get it. It doesnt bother me if a sexual encounter starts with a toy, but “let me grab my vibrator so I can finish” is a night that ends with me feeling like I’m not good enough and probably going to bed feeling bad about myself. It’s something thats turned a few dates into one night stands for me when I told them how it made me feel and they were dismissive of my feelings









  • (Sorry if this was a joke that went over my head and not an earnest question)

    Afaik its a strategy to scare off predators. The general idea goes like… predators dont want to get stung --> predators less likely to eat wasps --> fly pretends to be wasp --> predator less likely to eat fly for fear of being stung. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimicry here is a Wikipedia page if you feel like reading a much better longer description written by people who know a whole shitload more about biology than I do.



  • That’s a fair distinction. That being said, at their core llms are just big functions. You could cover a dartboard in subfields of physics, toss a dart randomly, and I’d bet money you hit a field that finds use for the bessel functions for instance. I am not informed enough on the specifics of llms to say either way, but there’s definitely precedent for “we found this really powerful function and it turns out it accurately predicts 10 shitloads of unrelated systems.”

    To double down on my devils advocacy, the projects I have personally seen or been consulted for that fit the form “use llm to solve non-nlp problem” are 99% propelled by “funding for Ai buzzwords flows freely” and “understanding of the limitations of different kinds of ai is rare”




  • Gustephan@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzi 💚 animals.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a shit take. The meme is showing two different stereotypes of college freshman. There is not a qualitative difference between the “hard” sciences and the others; the biologists climatologists and psychologists I’ve known all adhere to the same scientific method and mathematical rigor I learned getting my handful of grad and postgrad degrees in physics math and compsci. The only real difference I’ve seen is that “soft” sciences tend to work on problems with more stochastic moving parts, making them harder to understand on average. They’re not easier, you’re just ignorant of the complexity and too arrogant to consider the expertise and accomplishments of others.


  • Gustephan@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzi 💚 animals.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have literally designed and implemented aircraft parts based on inspiration I got listening to somebody infodump about an animal they were studying. Learn the things other people care about. It will make you better at what you care about and probably a better person in the process