People keep asking me, and I haven’t really had an answer, but now yeah, I’m thinking I’m back.

  • 1 Post
  • 254 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2025

help-circle

  • When I give myself the leeway to think of a less hardliner stance on AI, I come back to Joel Haver’s video on his use of ebsynth:

    It lets me create rotoscoped animations alone, which is something I never would have the time or patience for otherwise. Any time technology makes art easier to learn, more accessible, we should applaud it. Art should be in the hands of everyone.

    Now my blood boils like everyone else’s when it comes to being forced to use AI at work, or when I hear the AI Voice on Youtube, or the forced AI updates to Windows and VS Code, but it doesn’t boil for Joel. He clearly has developed an iconic style for his comedy skits, and puts effort into those skits long before he puts it through an AI rotoscope filter. He chose his tool and he uses it sparingly. The same was apparently true for E33, and I have no reason not give Kojima and Larian the same benefit of the doubt.

    On the other hand, Joel probably has no idea what I’m talking about when I say “surveillance state AI.” People Make Games has a pretty good video exposing its use case. There’s also…

    • the global and localized environmental impacts of all these data centers,
    • Nvidia and Micron pricing the consumer out of owning their own hardware,
    • aforementioned companies fraudulently inflating an economic bubble,
    • the ease with which larger models can be warped to suit their owners’ fascist agendas (see Grok).

    Creatives may be aware of some, or all, or none of those things, which is why it’s important to continue raising awareness of them. AI may be toothpaste that can’t go back in the tube, but it’s also a sunk cost fallacy, you don’t have to brush your teeth with shit-flavored toothpaste.


  • I have the same feeling about Kojima’s and Vincke’s latest comments on AI. Am I supposed to get mad at every single person who said they used/plan to use AI for something? I’d be as outraged as the average Fox News viewer, and it would be impossible to be taken seriously. I still won’t be using AI myself (fuck surveillance state AI) and I’d be making every effort to encourage others not to use it, but there’s no point in burning bridges and falling for rage bait.

    They’re creative people who care about the craft and care about the teams in their employ, which gives their statements weight, where some Sony/Microsoft/EA executive making an identical statement has none.








  • Almost got me with that hotness but I wouldn’t necessarily disagree. In a perfect world, we would just own digital copies free and clear of any remote tampering.

    Trouble is, physical media is relevant now because companies can’t nuke your access to it once their licensing deals expire, like they can with digital streaming services and storefronts. Even digital copies are physical, they have to sit on a hard drive somewhere, and even those degrade over time. So let’s say we own the hard drive, that’s great, but I still need to transfer it once the disk/flash dies. It’s unquestionably more efficient than disc media tho.







  • Take me with a grain of salt, but from what I understand Valve banned it when they received their evaluation build, and they found a scene of a child character “riding” on the back of an adult, naked, “horse” character, in the form of a human.

    Developer immediately took to social media to whip up the current media frenzy you see now. Whether the developer simply didn’t realize the implications of what they made, or whether they did it purposely for “artistic license” or “anti-puritan shock value” I leave to you.