Wtf, when did this happen?

I heard that they have a built-in catalytic converter with more platinum than cars

Or a liquid asset like stock. Just sell it next day

I think it might have something to do with him only wanting it specifically for men.

I mean, I can tolerate a $1 Trump coin if the stipulations are met…very very soon.

If they illegally arrested you in international waters, then yeah

There is also no time limit on bills that are eligible to be paid from HSA. So if you are able to, you can pay out of pocket now, keep a copy of the bill, and cash it in 15 years later.

SMILE uses laproscopy, so the slit is only 3mm instead of 20mm for LASIK. Supposedly like a 3 day recovery time or maybe 2.

Also, does it really never heal?

Why do they look like they are a part of the “Rogansphere” from an alternate universe?

Has to be, right?

I’d avoid hexbear, personally. I was excited to possibly find a more left leaning instance at first, but it was giving off russian bot vibes so now it’s on my block list.

The term is generally considered a firearm that can fire more than one shot with a single trigger pull. Its complicated and there is more nuance, especially if you are going by ATF definitions. But overall, that’s typically what they mean.

Not everyone is a good person.

It’s bussin

If the gun was plastic, the barrel would definitely be the hottest part of the gun. Would still be true if the gun was a lighter metal, I think. Hmmm

Girls have inherent value, not just instrumental value. Cute comment.

There is a trauma surgeon in the article stating she shouldn’t have even been allowed in the room, let alone allowed to drill into a patient’s skull.

Is it less ethical or more ethical if the patient had given informed consent?

No patient gives consent to who is helping in the surgery because there is an implicit understanding that it will only be performed by qualified licensed personnel. There are multiple regulating bodies that prevent unqualified people from practicing in a professional setting. So, it is not unreasonable to make this assumption.

My argument is that it would be one thing if this was a simple superficial elective surgery where the patient consented to allowing the doctor’s unqualified child “to give it a go” popping a pimple or something. It is significantly worse because it was a life-threatening emergency procedure where the doctor elected to increase the likelihood of failure/harm/death while the patient was in a position where they couldn’t consent to the doctor taking that unnecessary risk.

Allowing a literal child with 0 medical training/education to drill into/near a vital organ of someone experiencing an acute head injury while they are unconscious and without their consent? Naw, nothing wrong there at all.

Disney backpeddeled on that argument because of the PR nightmare. But the damage is done

My brain does not like. It’s stunlocked asking “why is this bold?” over and over again even though I already answered.