Not the one where he did a set at a game convention and no one even applauded?

It would be amazing if they counter sue for 15 billion.

The moral high grind they had when they were bombing hotels and murdering imams and rabbis that worked against them?

Yes.

Is Ukraine the USA? Last I checked no, no they’re not. So the non aggression pact stands, I’m pretty sure it even has a severability clause for participants.

What you’re actually saying is that Russia can invade because the USA is shitty? That’s a pretty slippery slope bud.

Removed by mod

True enough.

Removed by mod

And countries would never break the law right? Certainly not Russia who signed an non aggression agreement with Ukraine in 91 right?

I don’t need to. Their main military is by legislation conscripts. The claimant who said they’re mostly volunteer needs to prove that and no a retracted editorial is not a good source.

What’s your source dude?

A video from 2015, remind me again when was Ukraine invaded? Oh yeah 2014. Now do we think nothing has changed in a decade of fighting?

Ya dumb.

Easy the Russian military has been conscripts since like 1986, they have draft legislation. Unless you’re saying that doesn’t exist then I don’t need to. You need to prove that most Russians in Ukraine are volunteers, it’s your position you should have a source for it right?

So a single editorial video from 8 years ago and a single editorial neither with any sort of source and the second straight up being opinion?

So you have an actual source with first hand knowledge that can speak against Russian drafting and notably the increase in drafting since they decided to invade a sovereign nation?

Also the kyiv independent is… He’s me out here. Independent the Ukrainian stance officially is that they are in large part conscripts.

You chose run away and cry. You’re kinda making my point for me.

That wasn’t you either. It’s also not what I meant, prove most Russian soldiers are volunteers. That’s the premise.

Couldn’t explain how I’m wrong huh? Had to find a different thread to try to harass me with your strategic non answer bullshit to feel better about yourself, huh pal?

Helpful non answer. Explain your argument, I’m betting you can’t but I’m also willing to be wrong. To be honest I don’t think you have a point but sure let’s hear how a conscripted military service isn’t relying mainly on conscripts.

Lol yes, because I have eyes and can read and I happen to disagree with you I’m a useful idiot. Prove me wrong then bud, you can’t but the contortions you attempt aught to be enjoyable to watch.

No, I called them a bot because they’re spouting shit that doesn’t make sense if you read literally anything about it and only reply monosyllabic when pushed to explain themselves.

Though I do enjoy that you’re upset I would call someone acting like a bot a bot but you have no issue calling me a state department shill simply because you disagree with me. It’s very consistent and logical behavior that doesn’t at all make you a hypocrite and likely idiot.

Removed by mod

You certainly are.