and people realize just as well as you do where they can or should get their information

That’s definitely not the case. Some of the most popular sources of information are terrible (Eg: reddit and other social media, huberman).

Not sure if your comment is serious, but credentials are not a valid way to determine that information is accurate.

YSK that taking health advice from youtubers, celebrities and podcasters is a terrible idea.

This is mostly correct. Huberman, for example, is not a good source. But Rhonda Patrick seems decent.

Only take advice from research universities

This is not great advice. I’ve seen so many articles on sites like Harvard that contain harmful misinformation and no study citations.

Always look for citations to studies. But even that is not enough. The source can be cherry picking to push an agenda, or simply ignorant of other conflicting research. You really have to put a lot of effort in to find quality sources.

It’s not easy to find quality information, but sites like sciencedirect, eurekalert, and medicalexpress, are some of the better sources.

This is an absolutely nonsensical response, and a red herring logical fallacy. Extremely dishonest and unintelligent.

This is the original comment that linked to a plethora of scientific evidence: https://lemmy.world/post/37315936/19936596

This reply, and the votes on both of our comments, confirm exactly what I described.

Instead of reviewing the scientific evidence and changing one’s position accordingly, this guy went massively out of his way to try to create a personal attack, and everyone supported it because no one here is interested in the science/evidence, they’re just trying to support their preconceived notions & biases.

Extremely unintelligent & anti-scientific behavior.

Given this; and I only gave it a cursory look, why hasn’t this been picked up by a university?

That’s a great question. I wrote more about it here: https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/continued-letters-and-complaints-to-the-fda-nih-and-hhs-jan-2025-fmt.842/. It appears to be primarily incompetence and apathy. The FMT donor quality situation requires unique action, and they’ve shown an unwillingness to do that.

There’s also pharmaceutical industry influence and other monied interests, including by academics themselves: https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/tags/research-industrial-complex/

Second, what motive does the FDA have to stall an effective medicine?

They may not be purposefully stalling it. FMT is very unique from other things they regulate, and they haven’t shown any interest in creating FMT-specific/appropriate regulation. There’s little pressure on them to do so, so they may just be playing it safe and not taking any risks that might cause public outcry.

Regarding the current administration, they may be lying about ending the chronic disease crisis:

• https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/rfk-jrs-maha-project-funnels-millions-from-public-health-to-private-we.1101/
• https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/rfk-jr-hosts-roundtable-on-long-covid-sep-18-2025.1182/
• https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/priorities-for-a-new-fda-martin-makary-vinay-prasad-jun-2025.1146/
• https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/fda-names-former-pharmaceutical-company-executive-dr-george-tidmarsh-t.1129/
• https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/us-fda-makarys-pharma-ceo-tour-goes-against-transparency-rhetoric-may.1097/

Dad had been a medical-researcher: he taught me to think.

He didn’t teach you very well. Stop spreading harmful misinformation.

And to the people upvoting the misinformation, you really need to do some basic research and critical thinking first. Why would there be hundreds of FMT clinical trials around the world for curing chronic diseases if it were so easy with probiotics? Why would 60%+ of Americans have a chronic disease if you could simply cure them with probiotics?

It makes it seem very possible that the comment and upvotes above are deliberate astroturfing by the pharmaceutical industry.

The headline is completely misleading & false, but since it supports people’s biases, everyone is mindlessly agreeing with it.

If you want to actually learn about the cause of autism, and similar conditions, review the evidence: https://humanmicrobiome.info/brain/

There’s an existing cure for most chronic diseases. Unfortunately, no one seems to care, so it will likely never be available.

OP, given your knowledge of news media, perhaps you have some ideas of how to get coverage of the issue? I’ve written to dozens of news outlets about it.

There’s a citation there. You didn’t want to click it and learn something new?

EDIT: Interesting. The majority of people on lemmy are anti-learning…

Good. This is a massive problem on reddit that makes reddit completely useless, untrustworthy, dangerous, harmful, etc.

For microbiome & health there’s https://www.youtube.com/@HumanMicrobiome.

Here’s my primary claim: “This article is debunking the idea that there are probiotic benefits to eating dirt, which isn’t what we’re talking about at all”

Your claim starts with a misunderstanding. So you should start out by reading the citations more thoroughly.

My claim was that the page you linked is clearly talking about digestive health, not the immune system.

This is incorrect. And they are tightly interwoven.

So it’s worse than I thought, immediately, right off the bat, this page is already jumbling the concepts of digestive health and immune system. Just odd.

It’s not odd, it’s ignorance on your part, so read the citations more thoroughly so you get a better understanding.

That’s not how sources work. You should read about how to vet sources for accuracy before making foolish statements like that.

Stop spreading misinformation. Pretty much everything you just said is wrong.

What you’re doing harms people. You should stop.

You may be suffering from heavy metal poisoning.

Stopped there. Because that’s how your immune system learns.

“I chose to stay ignorant and re-state misinformation that you debunked”

And the bit with heavy metals is bull.

It cites the CDC, so you should contact the CDC and tell them to stop spreading “bull”.

It’s dangerous misinformation, regardless of how you want to phrase it. You do not need to eat dirt or play in dirt.

That’s dangerous misinformation. Debunked: https://humanmicrobiome.info/faq/#is-dirt-good-for-your-microbiome

Yes, common knowledge that is actually dangerous misinformation. Debunked: https://humanmicrobiome.info/faq/#is-dirt-good-for-your-microbiome

I don’t think it compares well to vaccines.

There’s a github issue request to solve this:

Add a local user setting to filter out image / meme posts, similar to NSFW filtering https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4988