Secondly, it’s very clear what they said is true

Source: Zionist media that would totally not lie to me

As per the other reply and if you’d have taken a few minutes to look up

Go ahead, tell me what’s the trend of Uyghur speakers in China versus Occitan speakers in France. Give me the fucking hard data if it’s so obvious

you’re apparently dumb

No need for ableism

absolutely anything reported/said by something or someone bad must be untrue

“Noooo how could the Zionist war machinery be lying to me :((((”

Everything, no matter who and where it comes from should be looked at through facts

Facts: pre-communist Tibet was a literal feudal kingdom in which Tibetans were serfs legally bound to the lands of their lord, with outrageously low life expectancy, close to zero literacy, amd massive poverty. Now it’s a thriving province in a multiethnical country and even has a higher degree of autonomy under the Chinese system due to belonging to the Tibet Autonomous Region. You’re quoting the fucking spiritual heir or Buddhism, not any fucking serious source

Your “alarming edit” is the thing I’m mainly responding to. What do you have to say to that Uyghur national?

Two circular links in The Guardian without primary sources. I wonder why Zionist media would lie to me about China!

For fuck’s sake, it was ruled by a literal emperor for millennia

…and then it became a communist country. I wish my homeland (Spain) had become communist instead of fascist in the 20th century

The reason you are so against this truth

I’m not against any truth, in fact I explained to you the reason why birthrate dropped in Xinjiang: massive rise in Uyghur female education and massive rise in Uyghur economic power

the victims

Let’s liste to an actual Chinese Uyghur then, instead of BBC

You do understand that the widely recognized genocide in North America is and has been criticized for this

Yes, but China hasn’t genocided its ethnical minorities though and isn’t on the process of doing so. Conjuring hypothetical genocides is not useful for political analysis.

The difference is that Spain, or especially so France (Occitan isn’t even an official language), actually carry out this policy, whereas this is manufactured bullshit that people are taking at face-value from Zionist media.

Anything can be true when you read Zionist media and take their word!

the end result is the same

Is it, though? Please provide us data on minority language usage over time in China, that would definitely show us

Yes, we should criticise France’s capitalist government for this, you’re right. Go ahead and make posts on .world about it. How’s that related to China though?

Free West Taiwan!

Are you a fascist? Do you know what the Kuomintang wanted to do to said minorities?

US is of European origin though, but sure

the claims of genocide are closely tied to sterilization

Source: anonymous interviews

interment

The reeducation camps have been closed since 2019, you’ve had 7 years to educate yourself but you’d rather repeat reddit comment propaganda because it suits your “China bad” mindset

dramatic drop in births

The Uyghurs were explicitly exempt from single-child policy, you uneducated twat, they attained majority-status in Xinjiang as a consequence… The largest predictors for fall in birthrates are female educational level and economic development, both of which have surged in Xinjiang over the past 20 years

The actual Europeans were not always that horrible (except the Spanish ofc)

What makes the Spanish worse than the Dutch, English or French? All enacted genocide where they arrived, brought in slaves from Africa, and funnily enough there are more native people left in the Spanish regions (Peru, Ecuador, Guatemala) than in the English-controlled ones, the Anglos were more thorough in their genocide.

Spain routinely kidnaps Roma children from their parents.

I’m Basque, we are “forced” to learn Spanish too since it’s a co-official language in out autonomous region of Spain

All co-official languages of the Spanish state are co-official in all of the state, this is state policy and not just in specific autonomous regions.

Your critique comes from a good place as a people whose culture and language have a history of repression under fascism, but you need to understand that the history of China is the polar opposite of that: the communists won the civil war against the fascist Kuomintang. They’ve had and still enjoy a level of cultural diversity unseen anywhere in Europe for the past century, especially Spain as I say because of our fascist history.

Trying to extrapolate the centralist repressive policy of Spain to a country as different, huge and diverse and China is simply bad analysis based on unfortunately wrong starting points. As a silly example, ethnic minorities in China were exempt from single-child policy.

If you want an Uyghur person’s perspective on this, I suggest you watch this short video. Please listen to actual minority voices within China instead of listening we western-manufactured hate campaigns.

Imagine quoting “the Tibet post” seriously, an Indian tabloid whose official stance is the defense of the “Tibet government in exile”. This would be like using a Russian-based “Marie Antoinette post” defending monarchy in France as the legitimate system.

It’s China. The ethnostate. The country known for acting solely in the interest of the ethnostate

Meanwhile, in China there are entire regions with extra political autonomy like the Xinjiang autonomous region or the Tibet autonomous region, with a higher degree of political freedom than most Han-majority regions. But knowing this would require that you base your criticism of China on actual reading and not reddit comments

Before claims about authenticity or validity of polls in China, check out the methodology and the country of origin of the institution who carried out the poll.