

refused to identify any source that you accept as valid if I used it apart of my argument
Well that was a dumb question then, just post the source if you have one and we’ll go from there
seem sure of what I believe
Based on the sub, the post, my first comment, the content of your reply and your unironic use of tankie I assumed you have anti-PRC bias, but if I’m wrong I’m wrong
I think the end of the CJR article is a little shaky but its still good for the overall report of the events. There was no massacre of thousands of people in the square like it was first reported by the West. It was a legitimate protest that was taken over by foreign influence (CIA) and enflamed to the point where people began murdering unarmed PLA soldiers. I don’t agree with what some soldiers then did and its terrible that innocent people died. It’s something the PRC has expressed regret about and is working to move past it with it’s people. You won’t find that kind of self-reflection and accountability in the West.




Um I never said that, and the conversation is focused on Tiananmen Square. I will say though that most of the what happened during the Cultural Revolution, some decisions by Mao, and their invasion of Vietnam are some things I disagree with.
I already explained that I’ve been through the whole Western narrative and don’t believe in what the West/CIA/imperialists have to say anymore. But still I’m waiting for somebody to send their source instead of saying “lol” or “it’s reality bro.” You’re going too off track you should’ve just sent what you believe and sources to back it up in the beginning instead of trying to “trap” me.
Innocent people were killed and it was a tradegy. Now if capitalists/reactionaries/ fascists/CIA agents were killed I’m not feeling bad for them.
So when you finally send something its just a short MSN article about China owning Rubio? Fuck Rubio lol do you actually believe what he says?