The insult isn’t being gay, the insult is being a hypocrite.

Do you actually know if he is gay, and therefore a hypocrite? Or are you just calling him gay because it would be funny?

Either way, the insult is still being gay. They wouldn’t call his wife a beard if it wasn’t a bad thing. Maybe you use homophobia even against a target you think is valid. I mean, if he is such a bad guy, then surely his actions are enough to use against him and not make up random grade school nonsense? Even if he was a gay hypocrite, that’s irrelevant to why he’s bad.

All of that is on top of the fact that by calling every homophobe gay, you are blaming homophobia on gay people.

I believe you

haha the joke is that he is gay, which is a bad thing because otherwise it wouldn’t be an insult. i am very smart

Being attracted to feminine / masculine individuals as opposed to women / men is far more common

That’s still bisexual though.

whatever chode, you’re entitled to your delusions

I’m deluded because I… *don’t* like Yoko’s music? You are truly blinded by hate.

well, it could be because everything she touched got demonstrably worse when she contributed. Huh…?

Not really? Sorry you don’t like Lennon’s post-Beatles career, but he would take great umbrage to you saying she “ruined” him.

as a Yoko Fan

I’m actually not, just because I’m not a Yoko Hater doesn’t mean I like her.

Artistically you’re going to say she added something GOOD to the performance?

Not at all, it’s rare for me to enjoy experimental music, I can just compartmentalize Yoko the artist and not try and pathologize her as banshee that seeks to ruin everything she touches because she makes noises I don’t like.

it’s a sure sign of someone who’s out there to ruin it for other people.

It’s not, you’re assigning motive based on how it makes you feel. She’s made experimental/avant garde music before without trying to “ruin” someone else’s fun, so the explanation with the least assumptions is that she simply felt like adding that to the mix.

Why is the narrative with Yoko Ono always that she’s trying to “ruin” something?

Count your calories and see what isn’t worth it. Usually the best thing to cut first is liquid calories, when I realized I could basically have another meal a day if I quit soda, it made things a lot easier.

I guess the most important thing would be to focus on lifestyle changes. You can have a super strict diet for months and lose tons of weight, but if you don’t incorporate that as a permanent change, it can be easy to gain it back while not in “diet mode.” Smaller changes that you stick with perpetually are better in the long run, even a 100 calorie daily deficit will eventually see results.

Also perhaps get a kitchen scale for portion control, this kinda ties in with counting your calories, but after I started measuring meals it was also easier to not overeat.

but she clearly was intent on shoving herself into the spotlight with him, through whatever means she felt was accessible

Well, I mean yeah, she cowrote and performed with him frequently, they were musical partners as well.

If you think the one Chuck Berry video that’s been memed to death is the extent of her creative contributions, you’re simply ignorant.

aww fuck he got me

We don’t prove things in the real world

Maybe you don’t, that’s not the fault of rationality.

But reasons do not arise from nature

A claim which you aren’t backing up.

Therefore, ultimately, they must be gotten via nonrational means. Ie : from authority, convention, aesthetics, intuition etc.

False dilemma

Seems like you have the problem with having a rational foundation, not rationality.

prove it

You’re weird, I stated a fact about what was said. If you’re so desperate for interaction, take it up with the person who said it.

lmao what a total dork they are

Nobody said reverse racism

You’re projecting hon

nobody said anything about circumstances

Being born a man is a circumstance, and if you judge someone for it it’s prejudice.

this is about men not doing shit about the patriarchy while at the same time painting themselves as the victims of it

This right here, also Goomba Fallacy.

Nobody deserves to be judged for the circumstances of their birth. If you make any exceptions, you’re breaking the social contract and nobody is obliged to tolerate you.

A different opinion doesn’t mean there is a misunderstanding

Sounds like you don’t think you can care about more than one thing at a time.