It’s true that NNs are strong at spotting patterns in masses of data, but trading is a particularly hard problem for this kind of task because the market constantly adapts to its participants. If other traders have found a pattern, it will already be priced in when you try to make money off it, and your strategy will fail. And since trading is a worldwide competition with billions of dollars to be won, you are naturally competing against teams of the best of the best who are willing to put massive resources into their algorithm development, computing, and data acquisition. Therefore the chances for someone like us to find an algorithm that systematically beats them is very low.

So for any young math/CS nerd who comes across this thread and wants to try their luck, be aware of the difficulty before you invest any real money, and learn about the merits of passive investing.

Same, have you tried WaniKani for learning the Kanji and vocabulary? It’s great.

I think you mean tuples, because (1) == 1, but (1, ) == tuple([1]).

Many programming languages allow “trailing commas”:

my_list = [ 1, 2, 3, ]

This is wonderful because you can treat the last element like the previous ones instead of having to make an exception. I use it all the time, even when it provides no benefit, and I think we should even start allowing it in natural language.

Hey, you’re finally awake.

“It’s a good life we lead, Luigi.”

“The best. May it never change.”

“And may it never change us.”

Goosebumps every time. I’ll never forgive Bowser for what happened.

Don’t know, I’ve never been to the US.

Had to read this a few times, it was a bit of a /c/aneurysmposting moment for me.

I don’t get it, can you explain?

The life is strange start menu music makes me feel things.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumentalism

Yes, opportunity cost is also a cost.

1D and 2D are just mathematical abstractions.

So are all dimensions. The number of dimensions is just an attribute of a vector space, and vector spaces are just models we humans define to describe natural phenomenona. You can claim that some of these models are more useful than others. But at no point does it make sense to claim that a model “exists” or not. There would be no meaning to such a statement, it would contain no information. Not wrong, just nonsensical.

I’d see it as a seal of quality if the developer is a crank.

Cheap ramen and splitscreen minecraft bro

I don’t know what kinds of allegations you’re trying to insinuate here. This isn’t about me anyway.

That’s irrelevant. But if someone leaves it, someone else will have to take it, is what I’m saying. Like in general.

So what do you think happens to all the shit you leave around? Someone’s gotta take it.

Is this ironic or did they actually? I kind find any source saying they did.

And if you had a dangerous person in your tribe, you better also paid very close attention to their behavior.