Oh, I do the same thing, I use the same extension that you do, it just doesn’t fit my use case for multiple profile management.

I can let my kids play on my computer without them screwing up my personal browser history or getting into any of my accounts without having to teach them how to use yet another extension.

Vivaldi has a great example of profile management where I can literally create a desktop shortcut for each person that uses my computer, complete with their name, and it’s their own separate internet profile.

Yes, I’m aware I could solve this problem by using multiple user profiles on my computer, but the overhead and the amount of management would also be a massive headache. It is just far easier to do this.

Finally! Profile management is easily the worst feature in firefox

Gamification of the system. I love it

This ain’t reddit, and everyone starts somewhere.

Apparently subdomains are inadequate, but after talking with some other people and seeing what you guys have to say, I can understand these requirements. He also created a network map, so we are able to better understand it.

Only an idiot would think this is political.

Next you’ll be telling us that declaring your religion is political.

Yes but most cars with an immobilizer can not be remotely activated unless a specific system is installed which is normally offered as a premium feature. Like if I had a keyless start Ford from 2014 Ford couldn’t remotely shut that car off.

No, there’s a few incredibly cheap cars that do not have these features. Also, I’ll just buy used cars. These features don’t exist in hardly any car before, like, 2015.

Yes, but I don’t have to buy a car with OnStar in it. It seems like every electric car has these OTA features at least in the states. In internal combustion cars that can avoid those features. I’d be more than happy to buy any one of these electric cars if I control the updates and there’s no always on connection.

Man, if all electric cars can do this bullshit, then I think I’m gonna just be stuck with an internal combustion engine no matter how bad they are for the environment.

Ain’t no way I’m gonna get into a vehicle that can be remotely disabled by a jackass.

Wow that feels like an exercise in the absurd

Evidently not well. Seems like they don’t want you to retire according to the article

Eh I thought it looked ok

Oh, I missed the 11 years part.

That’s like half their GDP, are we sure this is accurate?

Edit:

Over 11 years, it’s about $100 billion, per year or about 5% of their GDP.

Yeah someone will host that for the right price

No good cops anywhere

Need an FTC that would support that and we l, uh, don’t in a word.

Yeah but those services tend to care a lot less then the payment processors but the I do see your point.

For instance, it’s not as easy as you think to get a website pulled down, or to get a domain name restricted, mostly because they’re not paid for on a monthly basis, they’re paid for on a yearly basis, and sometimes they even have contracts for multi years.

Different clouds support different things, that’s why sites like Parlour still exist despite the massive amount of animosity the administrators of that site face.

Getting a hold of a global register to get them to do something about a domain name on their register, while possible, is not nearly as easy as getting hold of the payment processor.

It seems to me that if payment processing was made to be less effective by this tactic, they would have to choose less effective tactics that sites could choose to ignore. You’re right that they don’t own the hardware, but for big companies like Valve, it would be a pretty trivial setup for them especially with companies out there like open cloud.