

first of all, this disagreements just focuses on the ‘birth’ part, which is not the main part of my original statement. Replace ‘place of birth’ with ‘place of education’ or ‘origins’ and you got the same result.
Fair enough.
last, being born male can also comes with innate disadvantages (less tolerance to pain, less flexibility) and acquired disadvantages (less elegance, more competition), not even including the hardship of being trans in our societies and the impacts of transition treatments. ‘Male chromosomes advantages’ mostly are strength and endurance, which are not the only factor in sports.
So you do acknowledge that there are innate differences between males and females, although you prefer to focus on the disadvantages rather than the advantages.
Plus most of the factors that disadvantage women in sports come from social background rather than biological ones.
I would agree with that statement. But that still means that if you equalized the social differences, the biological ones would remain. Although it would be a much smaller discrepancy, it still wouldn’t be an even playing field. It’s just unfair, and that bothers me.
And in the end, we cannot observe an overwhelming winrate in favor of trans athletes.
This isn’t a topic where the statistics are helpful whatsoever. The sample size is way too small, and there isn’t any control group, so the relative performance of transgender athletes could be significantly affected by any number of variables aside from their transgender status.












Non