

The same treaties that define what are international waters also define universal jurisdiction for some crimes - every country is allowed to exercise their sovereignty against pirates for example. The list “just” needs to be expanded.


The same treaties that define what are international waters also define universal jurisdiction for some crimes - every country is allowed to exercise their sovereignty against pirates for example. The list “just” needs to be expanded.
Lol, they don’t even match consistently between Portuguese and Spanish which are much closer, even when the noun is literally the same (e.g.a água vs el água)

It takes a special kind of person to accept being punched in the head for a living.


We understand reasoning enough to know humans (and other animals with complex brains) reason in a way that LLMs cannot.
While our reasoning also works with pattern matching it incorporates immeasurably more signals than language - language is almost peripheric to it even in humans. And more importantly we experience things, everything we do acts as a small training round not just in language but on every aspect of the task we are performing, and gives us a miriad of patterns to match later.
Until AI can match a fragment of this we are not going to have an AGI. And for the experience aspect there’s no economic incentive under capitalism to achieve, if it happens it will come out of an underfunded university.

The same applies to most gang members.


It still solves one end of the problem. The cable problem probably needs enforcement from law side.


It’s eastern Poland tilting the scales to the far-right, despite all the nationalistic talk they are still pretty russified.


Like all dating apps they have a strong incentive to promote superficial short-term connections over long term relationships so they have repeated customers. The worst thing that can happen to a dating app is their users finding a long term partner.


IMO those measures should include allowances for family size, but people with swimming pools should get eye watering bills.


I think it’s Samurai Bringer.


In a prop that appears in several episodes and was carefully placed each time.
It’s clearly intended to be an obscure Easter Egg and not a big plot point, but regularly displaying that exact book is not accidental.
The last men standing were always going to be the extreme-right thugs that have been meeting with the Israeli diplomats Netanyahu has been using as his personal money couriers.


In other news, asking Nick Clegg before emptying out his home would kill the robbery industry.

Can’t wait for the first “AI did it” court case and/or shareholder meeting.


That’s were the ambiguity comes into play. The laws related to cookies want to allow things like cookies for fraud prevention and antibot protection, the problem starts when the business people say the personalised ad revenue makes it legitimate and the developers and product managers decide that having a bazillion trackers making their job a little easier makes it absolutely essential.


Yes.


Rejecting cookies without asking every time requires a cookie and that is clearly legitimate interest. The problem with legitimate interest is that it’s not well defined enough and then you have companies claiming that Adsense personalization is an absolute necessity for their website.


They seem to be claiming Llama and Epic broke the collective agreement with the union.


When you are talking about diplomats, very little.
Software company’s CEO wants the money to go to his company.