Too many bits of a smartphone are proprietary hardware without open drivers.

So how many frames is this, do we think, just for this clip…

You can be a professor of a thing, for example. You don’t have to be the thing.

Actually that’s over reaching what the judgement said. The SC said that the equalities act, as worded, needs the word female to mean biological in order to make sense. Not that trans women could not be women, just not with regards to way this specific act was worded if you were relying on it. Now parliament can review the act and see how differently to word it to accommodate both female at birth and trans women etc.

This does also require the press to do the reporting but their remit seems to be only the bad bits.

I think if you are a part of those three then you are automatically part of GB

It’s about the latter but it doesn’t have to work, just looks like you took action to solve a Daily Mail agenda…

Yeah, so oats plus oats plus water

Is that not just oatmeal and water?

Difficult but legally required by them, including establishing your bona fides.

Really? Like where are you thinking about?

Boomers have been in power for a long long time and the technology we are debating is as a result of their investment and prioritisation. So am not sure they are very afraid of it.

They would rise but not uniformly esp if we could charge accurately. So we would start to penalise the more destructive models and encourage lower transport choices.

Could be that that is employee headcount and not including contractors.

Only the eye for an eye was the bible, the world goes blind was Ghandi.

Seems sensible but if we imagine that by some measure, like PISA, our children seemed to be stagnating or going backwards, who will be accountable? Then a PM will say, elect me and i will take responsibility.

It’s annoying but also inevitable for as long as we demand that our PMs fix things and be accountable.

Because the notes are in markdown, so are portable forever even if Obsidian went away.

Well, not to diss on giving to charity but two technical arguments against. One is, you are acting as an additional tax on the worker (the source of the surplus) and then redirecting that tax to charity. It’s fine but the elected government has democratically selected priorities that they can rarely fund so it is better to just give it to the treasury. And 2, just don’t collect this tax in the first place, allowing the worker to spend it on the local economy.

The if is JC running?

But don’t brigadiers outrank sergeant majors?