the interaction that is done in Australia is not part of the business chain.

Then it’s not subject to our laws, which is why an Australian walking up to an Italian vendor in Italy is a bad analogy…no interaction is done in Australia. It doesn’t matter if it’s an Australian buying something in Italy, our laws don’t apply to your original analogy.

As for your last paragraph I agree and that’s probably one area where it will fail.

Aussie Zone applied the law as required. They don’t agree with it either but yeah, not much option unfortunately.

As for other instances, I have no idea.

Most of the links on that sub are from poor or clickbaity sources.

I think that’s what happened to me.

So it looks as if you’ve added ‘this but on the internet’ afterward, is that correct?

Taking that away, no, because my point with using an online store was that some interaction is done in Australia, as is the case with social media sites overseas that Australians interact on, in Australia. Replace online store for ‘mailed catalogue’.

Voting doesn’t make a difference at this level, because where it did make a difference, they failed to vote.

There’s only one solution the US has to get out of the hole it’s in. Progressives must vote out the problem Democrats in primaries, which means they all have to vote in that, then vote those people in, come the elections. It’s the only way the US can get where it needs to be to make the changes socialists want. The US doesn’t have the systems in place like ranked choice to do things differently.

You don’t have a choice. You’ve got to vote your way out of it, if you get another chance.

The only other way is the one some think they want but they actually really don’t, which is not likely to work the way they want anyway.

selling Italian goods…

A better analogy would be ‘Australian buys Italian goods from online store in Australia’. Under your analogy no, because nothing at all is done in Australia, where your online shop would be, therefore it’d be subject to Australian law.

It’s still not a very effective law, though.

I saw someone earlier say it was on the basis of anonymity…people don’t actually have ‘accounts’, so there’s nothing to verify. How accurate that is I don’t know and I’ve never used 4chan.

The proof

Pretty sure the national boxing federation of her country know that she’s a woman. I’m fairly certain several of her coaches, doctors and support staff have a bit more to go on than her word.

verified by several independent sex tests

nobody that has seen the results will go on record…several people havepublicly stated

Yeah it’s called ‘trust me bro’. As good as what I have I suppose, though I’ll take Muslim country only letting a woman box as a woman.

Why bother trying to push a false narrative

I’m pushing jack shit. I’m satisfied with what stands. I’m happy she’s a woman. Those who beat her don’t give a fick and neither do most she’s beaten. I’d be happy with it if she was a trans woman but she’s a woman so yeah. You’re the one pushing a narrative.

Nope, it’s based on the fact she’s had to prove she’s a woman before she can enter international sports events and tournaments.

None of that is my logic, that’s your dog shit interpretation. Because you think in such a fashion does not mean the rest of us do.

She is a woman, perhaps with high testosterone readings as many women have but she’s still a woman. Your current Olympic Women’s gold medallist in the relevant division, what’s more.

How about you arseholes just leave her alone to enjoy her achievements? Something you’d never get close to.

More than you do that she isn’t. Your link was dogshit. She may have high testosterone et al counts for a woman but she is still a woman.

Beyond that you are well aware that a) I haven’t looked at her naked body and b) probably aware that I’m not a sports or medical scientist connected to her career so stop your bullshit; it’s a lazy, garbage call to make. The evidence I have is that she represents a Muslim country and they would make damn sure she’s a woman.

She’s certainly a lot closer to a woman than a man that’s for sure. Furthermore, she’s been beaten in competition by other women, so she can be beaten.

I can tell you don’t have a great understanding of the boxing world. I’ll say this much; there’s a lot of women boxers with high natural hormonal counts. They’re tough women with quite a few of them well toward the male end of the spectrum. I know some of them can’t wait to have a crack at Khelif because they know shes the best, both physically and mentally.

Time to pack it up ay? You don’t know what you’re talking about.

is not trans

Correct. She’s a woman. That’s why her country allowed her to box as one.

I don’t know. Perhaps I’ll start with the fact it’s highly unlikely a Muslim country would allow a trans male to represent them in boxing at the Olympics?

How about you pass that bar first?

…

Here as well. We’re obviously not among those who put travelling down as a hobby.

Edit: though my water supply is no issue

There’s also the problem of government supported solar only being available to homeowners, which means a vast number of households aren’t in the program. Those renters are the ones that fund it without benefit.

Another one of the points of separation between Australia A and the rest of us.

That’s a terrible link. There’s no evidence there whatsoever.

Khelif is a woman.

I’d say they will, I know three others that use it regularly enough and none of them use the app.

Or stocks of much needed rare earths to build these things is in short supply.

Or ‘goon’ Aussie for 4 litres of cheap wine in a bag