Then they would need to know where you are as well.

You have a point, but perhaps try a softer tone next time. I think that would help your argument.

I think you’re doing your argument a disservice by comparing it to theory of gravity. But I do appreciate learning about this hypothesis and that there is actual experimentation going on. Thanks again for sharing.

Thanks, that’s an interesting read. Still stand by my opinion that your statement is overly confident in explaining consciousness.

Any source on your claim about consciousness? Sounds very speculative.

Super interesting. Thanks for sharing!

Does it not need to be scraped to be indexed, assuming it’s semi-typical RAG stuff?

Why couldn’t you make that with wood? I don’t think it has to be hardwood even, but sure, that’s always nice.

Edit: check out this book about building a workbench for woodworking. You probably don’t need such rigidity but it’s a could be good to use as reference.

Who has complained about that?

Fry them in butter and eat them on toast.

Still don’t understand what you are talking about.

Anyone was welcome to submit suggestions, including graphic designers.

Thanks a lot!

PWA is a progressive web app. It’s essentially a website which can be added to your Home Screen as an app. With the correct meta data it can look and behave just like a native app.

deleted by creator

Didn’t it collapse because they walked in unison, causing resonance?

Yeah it seems to be the case as China didn’t respect the deal it made with UK to leave Hong Kong autonomous. If 3.5% of China did that it would most likely be a blood bath, be it a violent or non-violent protest.

I think we’re all aware. And Hong Kong isn’t (wasn’t) China in terms of governance(“one country, two systems”). China broke the deal it made with UK, which said Hong Kong would be autonomous until 2048, after which it would be incorporated into China.

But you’re right, not much to do when China claims authority and no one defends its right to free speech, democracy and autonomy.

Edit: added some need nuance on the “one country, two systems”.

Hong Kong was supposed to be free to control itself until 2048, democracy and free speech etc. China the decided that Hong Kong was starting to getting a little too free and started to tell the sitting president to shut the protests down.

China eventually took back control and instituted a national security law that could be used for pretty much anything after the crackdown didn’t quell the unrest.

I was actively following it live as it unfolded. It was very sad to see how much young people fought for basic freedoms and still lost it.

I remember being torn between my general non-violence stance and also understanding the protestors reciprocating the police violence.

Tell that to Hong Kong demonstrators on June 16, 2019, estimated by organizers at 2 million people marching. Hong Kong had a population of 7.5 million at the time.

Sure there was violence both before and after that protest, but mostly caused by violent crackdown by police.

But did it fail because there was violence or was violence a sign of stronger opposition? Causation vs correlation and all that.