• jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      A loop hole that is technically correct is still correct.

      What is the purpose of marriage?

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legally it is a shortcut to establishment of a number of implied contracts, tells the courts how to unwind those contracts, and rights. In some cases the implied contracts are more effective than written ones. Medical decisions and visitation rights being first ones I can think of.

        I sm not a lawyer.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.”

          If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only two? That seems needlessly restrictive. Is it for religious reasons? Church and state should be separated.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re thinking about this all wrong. The age of marriage and childbearing have been going up. Think of the kids who would just decide fuck it might as well just stay married and do this. This could be the arranged marriage of the future.